It’s almost here! In a few short weeks we will see you all again for the 2023 NAGDCA Annual Conference, this time in lovely Seattle. Preparations are in full swing to put on a great show for you all. Our panelists have spent months honing their presentations, and every session is uniquely tailored to provide you with information you can use to make your plan better. While all our sessions are excellent (really!), I want to highlight a few that are especially important this year.
First, earlier this year we asked several experts from the plan sponsor and industry communities to help us develop a foundational resource for record keeping, investment and consulting fees. The result was a comprehensive Fees Guide that lays out definitions, structures, and cost factors that impact overall plan fees. I highly encourage you to check out the results of their work when it’s released next week. It’s incredibly informative and intended to provide you with a reference document you can keep coming back to as you manage your plans. In Seattle, members of the task force that developed the guide will talk about their experience and highlight key areas of the Guide to explore. You won’t want to miss it!
We are also looking forward to our annual business meetings. Board staff and I provide important updates for the association at each session, and for our industry members, you get the chance to vote for your representatives on the Industry Committee. We have two great candidates this year – Vince Ortega from Capital Group and Jamie Salafia from Lincoln Financial – who are long-time members and supporters of NAGDCA. I’m certainly glad I don’t have to pick between them. Each industry company has one vote, but you must be present to vote, so be sure to attend.
Finally, we will close out on Wednesday with our legislative update. Even with very helpful recent Treasury guidance, much uncertainty remains about SECURE 2.0. We have assembled a panel of the industry’s best minds to walk through the latest guidance and look ahead to the future of retirement legislation. It will truly be a must-see event.
While we are focused on the conference, we do have one opportunity to provide input on regulation before we head to Seattle, and we need your help. As part of their guidance last month, Treasury/IRS asked for comments on clarification that is still needed to better implement SECURE 2.0. To date, we are tracking the following issues:
- Flexible guidance for long-term, part-time workers,
- FICA wage issues,
- Permissible investment options for emergency sidecar accounts, and
- Multiemployer plan considerations.
Each of these issues is important, but we know you likely have others you have encountered. If your plan or your clients need guidance on aspects of SECURE 2.0 not covered above, please send a description of the issue to nagdca@amrms.com by September 29. We will review all submissions and add as many as we can to our comment letter.
Thank you again for your membership and support – and see you soon!
All the Best,
Matt Petersen
Executive Director
By Groom Law Group
As of this writing, Congressional negotiations to keep the government open past the end of the fiscal year on September 30 have stalled. Proposals in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives have been torpedoed by internecine squabbles, while the Democratically-controlled Senate has failed to muster enough votes to pass committee-approved, agency-specific spending bills.
This spending gridlock and overall level of dysfunction mean that there is little hope of a SECURE 2.0 technical corrections bill making it through Congress any time soon. Our best guess is to say that maybe a corrections package could ride along on an omnibus spending bill, but we have little insight into when such a package might come together. It may not be in 2023.
Thankfully for NAGDCA members, on August 23 the IRS issued Notice 2023-62 to address the mandatory Roth catch-up provision that was concerning to so many of you. Notice 2023-62 affords a two-year transition period and signals future guidance to facilitate ongoing implementation efforts. You can read our previous write-up on that guidance here.
In Notice 2023-62, the IRS requested feedback on not just the Roth catch-up provision, but other aspects of SECURE 2.0 (all detailed in our write-up linked above). In order to craft the best guidance possible – and as the only retirement train leaving the legislative guidance station for a while – it’s important that the agency hear from NAGDCA about its members’ concerns. As Matt Petersen mentioned in his note, please submit comments to him by September 29 so that NAGDCA’s comment letter most accurately reflects the needs of government defined contribution administrators.
NAGDCA remains in discussions with policymakers concerning 403(b) plan access to collective investment trusts (“CITs”). In 2021, NAGDCA endorsed legislation on this issue, the Public Service Retirement Fairness Act (H.R. 2741, 117th Cong.) sponsored by Rep. Jimmy Panetta (D-CA). That proposal remains stalled and is unlikely to advance. Various groups outside of NAGDCA have been weighing in with proposals. One group is advocating allowing 403(b)s administered by hospitals and universities to take advantage of CITs, but not K-12 plans. Another group is pushing for a broader expansion beyond CITs and to not include this K-12 limitation. NAGDCA remains focused on expanding opportunities for 403(b) plan investments and will continue to provide updates.
OCTOBER IS NATIONAL RETIREMENT SECURITY MONTH
National Retirement Security Month (NRSM), scheduled for October 2023, is an opportunity to increase awareness and educate employees about the importance of saving for retirement by investing in an employer-sponsored defined contribution plan.
Now is the time to finalize plans for how your organization will promote the month. Click below to learn more and access campaign resources.
SECURE 2.0 | Roth Catch-Up Guidance
Recording available!
Click below to access the recording of the discussion about the guidance from the Treasury regarding the catch-up provisions in SECURE 2.0. The Groom team discusses the guidance with Executive Director Matt Petersen and answers questions from attendees.
Extreme Measures:
How Puerto Rico’s Bankruptcy Caused a Radical Change to Its Public Pension Retirement Systems
By Chet B. Waldman, Senior Partner, Wolf Popper LLP
Puerto Rico’s Financial Crisis
Over the last several decades, a multitude of factors contributed to the steep economic downturn of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (the “Commonwealth” or “Puerto Rico”), including a contracting economy, population decline, and changes in tax status and available credits under the U.S. tax code. From the early 2000s through 2016, Puerto Rico’s public debt rose rapidly, in part, from borrowing to cover deficits including to pay debt service, and the outlook for Puerto Rico’s economy continued declining.[1]
By 2016, Puerto Rico was “in the midst of a fiscal crisis.”[2] The Commonwealth was “being crushed under the weight of a public debt that [was] larger” than its gross national product, “it ha[d] started to default on its debt obligations,” and it had lost access to external financing.[3] The Commonwealth had over $120 billion in combined debt and unfunded pension liabilities. Specifically, as of August 31, 2016, the Commonwealth had approximately $74 billion of funded debt, estimated pension liabilities of approximately $55.6 billion[4], and insufficient resources to meet those obligations.[5]
Consequently, on June 30, 2016, the President of the United States. signed into law legislation passed by Congress, the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (“PROMESA”), 48 U.S.C. § 2101 et seq., to work toward a remedy for the ongoing fiscal and humanitarian crises in Puerto Rico. “The goal of PROMESA is to meet Puerto Rico’s immediate need to provide its citizens effective services, to formulate a debt restructuring, and to implement fiscal reform leading to a sustainable economy, fiscal responsibility, and market access.”[6]
PROMESA establishes two primary mechanisms for restoring fiscal responsibility. First, Titles I, II, IV and V of PROMESA create the Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico (the “Oversight Board”) and provide it powers and duties governing the review and certification of multi-year fiscal plans, annual budgets, and infrastructure revitalization, and fast-tracking key infrastructure projects. Second, Titles III and VI of PROMESA provide for debt restructurings, similar to bankruptcy cases and out-of-court restructurings, respectively, for Puerto Rico and its instrumentalities.[7] By incorporating many provisions of Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) into Title III of PROMESA, which provides for restructurings similar to restructurings under chapters 9 and 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, the statute also protects the debtors (i.e., the Commonwealth and certain government affiliated agencies including the Employees Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“ERS”)). The Oversight Board is the sole representative of any debtor entity in a Title III case, with the exclusive authority to propose a plan of adjustment.
Historic Problems Leading to Oversight Board
To overcome decades of severe economic decline, operating deficits, lack of financial transparency, management inefficiencies, and excessive borrowing,[8] PROMESA established an independent entity within Puerto Rico’s government – the Oversight Board.[9] The Oversight Board is “an entity within the territorial government,” rather than a “department, agency, establishment, or instrumentality of the Federal Government.”[10] The Oversight Board is statutorily charged with restoring to the Commonwealth fiscal responsibility and market access.[11] To achieve success in carrying out its statutory mission, the Oversight Board is granted authority to oversee the restructuring of the Commonwealth’s and its instrumentalities’ debt and to require fiscal reforms.
A New Landscape – Hurricanes Irma and Maria
In September 2017, the difficulty of improving Puerto Rico’s financial status worsened as Puerto Rico was devastated by Hurricanes Irma and Maria. The hurricanes destroyed much of Puerto Rico’s infrastructure and upended the daily lives of all Puerto Ricans and the work of the Oversight Board.[12]
Recent Earthquakes and Aftershocks
On December 28, 2019, the first of many significant earthquakes and aftershocks struck Puerto Rico, registering at a magnitude of 4.7 of the Richter scale. On January 6, 2020, Puerto Rico experienced a 5.8 magnitude earthquake and the next day experienced a 6.4 magnitude earthquake, the Caribbean’s strongest and most destructive earthquake in a century. Then, on May 2, 2020, another 5.4 magnitude earthquake struck Puerto Rico’s southwestern coast. The seismic event, which briefly knocked out power to some areas, hit near the city of Ponce where hundreds of structures, including homes and houses of worship, remain damaged or destroyed.[13]
These earthquakes represent only four of more than 1,000 overall earthquakes of magnitude 3 or greater in Puerto Rico during 2020, with six being over a 5.5 magnitude. According to a January 29, 2020 report published by the United States Geological Survey, there is a high likelihood of continued, material aftershocks over the course of the next several years.[14] These earthquakes have caused significant damage to homes and buildings on Puerto Rico’s southern coast, as well as significant damage to the Costa Sur power plant owned and operated by the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”), which would typically provide approximately 21% of Puerto Rico’s power.
COVID-19 Impact and Response
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) a global pandemic. As a result of the health threat and to contain the virus spread across Puerto Rico, then-Governor Vázquez-Garced issued an executive order on March, 12, 2020, declaring a state of emergency in Puerto Rico to concentrate all efforts and implement necessary measures to safeguard the health, well-being, and public safety of the citizens of Puerto Rico.[15]
Ultimately, the Oversight Board collaborated with the Government to develop new fiscal plans with the overarching goal of fulfilling PROMESA’s mandates. To do so, the fiscal plans would require a series of ambitious structural reforms and fiscal measures to restore growth and opportunity to the people and businesses of Puerto Rico.[16]
The Massive Changes to Puerto Rico’s Public Pension Systems
Puerto Rico’s three pension systems (ERS – Employee Retirement System -, TRS – Teachers’ Retirement System -, and JRS – Judicial Employees Retirement System) (the “Systems”) were dramatically changed following the enactment of Puerto Rico’s Act 106 in August 2017 during the time of the Commonwealth’s bankruptcy. Effective July 1, 2017, all employer contributions were eliminated pursuant to Act No. 106-2017 and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (the “Commonwealth” or the “Government”) implemented a “pay-as-you-go” (“PayGo”) system for the payment of pensions. Also, pursuant to Act No. 106-2017, the Systems were required to liquidate their assets and transfer the net proceeds to the Department of Treasury of the Commonwealth to pay future pension benefits.
More specifically, on August 23, 2017, the Government of Puerto Rico enacted the Law to Guarantee the Payment of Our Pensioners and Establish a New Plan of Defined Contributions for Public Servants (Act 106), which transformed the Systems into the single PayGo Plan. Act 106 included a declaration that the Systems were in a state of “financial emergency” and cited sections of the Constitution of Puerto Rico vesting the Legislature with authority to pass laws “for the protection of the life, health and wellbeing of the People…when the health, public safety or essential government services are clearly in jeopardy.”
Prior to Act 106, the Systems each maintained both defined benefit plans (for which benefit payments were primarily funded by the Commonwealth and other agencies and municipalities that employed municipal workers) and hybrid plans (funded primarily by employer contributions). However, the Commonwealth’s primary liability to the Systems prior to Act 106, was for its required annual contributions as an employer.
Through Act 106 the Puerto Rican government transformed the Systems into a single “pay-as-you-go” system (the “Plan”) whereby future benefit payments were guaranteed by Puerto Rico’s general fund. Act 106 was enacted to address the immediate insolvency of the Systems and avoid extreme hardship and social disorder. The Government’s exercise of its police powers in passing Act 106 represented a post-petition guaranty of retiree statutory obligations. Vested pension benefits are property rights under Puerto Rico law.
Under Section 2.4 of Act 106, the Government guaranteed payment of “Accumulated Pension” benefits under all of the then-existing three Systems. Section 3 of Act 106 further contemplates that the guaranteed payments will be made out of (i) a newly created “Accumulated Pensions Payment Account” funded by the liquidation of ERS/JRS/TRS assets; (ii) a pay-go charge to be imposed on Commonwealth agencies, public corporations, municipal governments, and the judicial branch; (iii) budget assignments and special assignments to finance pension payment deficits; (iv) donations; and (v) other funds identified by Puerto Rico’s Legislative Assembly.
Section 3.1 of Act 106 also created a new “Defined Contribution Plan” (i.e., the “Plan”), under which all participants in the Systems will make monthly contributions that will be placed in individual Defined Contribution Accounts for each active Plan participant, contributions to these accounts will supplement the “Accumulated Pension” benefits that existed prior to enactment of Act 106. The employee contributions to the Defined Contribution Plan are deposited in a trust account held by the Trust Division of Banco Popular de Puerto Rico and separate from other funds of the Commonwealth (the “Pension Reserve Trust”).
Certain plan provisions are different for the three groups of members who entered the Plan prior to July 1, 2013 as described below:
- Members of Act. No 447 are generally those members hired before April 1, 1990 (contributory, defined, benefit program).
- Members of Act No. 1 of February 16, 1990 (Act No. 1) are generally those members hired on or after April 1, 1990 and on or before December 31, 1999 (contributory, defined benefit program).
- Members of Act No. 305 of September 24, 1999 (Act No. 305 or “System 2000”) are generally those members hired on or after January 1, 2000 and on or before June 30, 2013 (defined contribution program).
All regular employees hired for the first time on or after July 1, 2013, and former employees who participated in the defined benefit program and the System 2000 program, and were rehired on or after July 1, 2013, become members of the “Contributory Hybrid Program” as a condition to their employment. In addition, employees who at June 30, 2013, were participants of previous programs became part of the Contributory Hybrid Program on July 1, 2013. Also, Act No. 3 of April 4, 2013 (Act. No. 3 of 2013) froze all retirement benefits accrued through June 30, 2013 under the defined benefit program and, thereafter, all future benefits accrued under the defined contribution formula used for the System 2000 program participants.[17]
Puerto Rico Department of the Treasury Announces 2023 Limits on Qualified Retirement Plans
The Puerto Rico Department of the Treasury recently issued Internal Revenue Circular Letter No. 23-01 (CL-IR 23-01) announcing the applicable 2023 limits for Puerto Rico qualified retirement plans. The following are the applicable 2023 limits:
- Annual Benefit Limit applicable to defined benefit plans – $265,000 (increased from $245,000 for 2022).
- Annual Contribution Limit applicable to participant accounts in defined contribution plans – $66,000 (increased from $61,000 for 2022).
- Annual Compensation Limit – $330,000 (increased from $305,000 for 2022).
- Compensation Limit for highly compensated employees (HCE) – $150,000 (increased from $135,000 for 2022). This is the limit for the base year (2023) for 2024 testing in the case of calendar year plans.
- Catch-Up Contributions Limit applicable only to federal government employees ages 50 or over – $7,500 (increased from $6,500 from 2022).
- Elective Cash or Deferral Contributions Limit applicable to participants in a plan sponsored by the federal government or a plan qualified under both Section 1081.01(a) of the PR Code and Section 401(k) of the US code – $20,000 (unchanged from 2022).
- Elective Cash or Deferral Contributions Limit applicable to participants in a plan qualified only under Section 1081.01(a) of the PR Code – $15,000 (unchanged from prior years).
- Catch-up Contributions Limit applicable to participants in a plan not sponsored by the federal government who at the end of the plan year are at least 50 years of age – $1,500 (unchanged from prior years).
- After-Tax Voluntary Contributions by employees participating in a plan qualified only under Section 1081.01(a) of the PR Code – 10% of the aggregate compensation of the employees for all years in which they are participants in a retirement plan (unchanged from prior years).
Has the PayGo System Been Working As Intended?
According to Christian Sobrino, the Governor-appointed Chairman and Executive Director of the Puerto Rico Fiscal Agency and Financial Advisory Authority between July 2017 – July 2019 and a corporate attorney, “the PayGo system has generally been working as intended with few bumps in the road. The one notable issue the PayGo system faced when rolled out had to do with Section 2.4 of Act 106, which requires a pay-go charge to be imposed on Commonwealth agencies, public corporations, municipal governments, and the judicial branch. The problem arose because municipal government and public corporations generally had not included the pay-go charge in their budgets or had not adjusted their revenue measures to raise their pay-go charge. As a result, certain municipalities and public corporations did not pay all of the PayGo charges the law demands causing the trust account to pay deposits (the Pension Reserve Trust) to have less money than it was supposed to have. For example, during the previous administration, the municipality of San Juan accrued a payable of approximately $100 million to the Plan.”
One serious concern going forward with respect to the PayGo system relates to the economic performance of Puerto Rico and the performance of its tax base. If its taxpayer and/or tax revenue base shrinks, the Commonwealth’s ability to adequately fund the PayGo Plan is threatened. Many economists and others believe Puerto Rico’s tax revenue base will be severely challenged in the future. If that occurs, it could result in dire consequences for the Plan.
Indeed, according to the Financial Oversight & Management Board for Puerto Rico’s Fiscal Plan for Commonwealth of Puerto Rico certified as of April 3, 2023 (Vol. I – Transformation Plan (the “2023 Fiscal Plan”)), while Puerto Rico’s economy received a huge post-COVID economic boost from the U.S. government, the Commonwealth faces serious future risks to its economic health and taxpayer base.
As mentioned in the 2023 Fiscal Plan, “a strong post-COVID recovery fueled by federal stimulus funding has generated near-term economic outperformance in Puerto Rico and across U.S. states. However, federal funds have an outsized and temporary impact that may mask underlying structural weaknesses. Across key economic indicators, Puerto Rico has shown strong performance…” [18]
However, as that same 2023 Fiscal Plan noted, “near term, unprecedented inflows of federal funds are waning, and may be masking underlying weakness in the economy. The economy of Puerto Rico is sensitive to changes in the level of federal funding since federal funds have historically comprised approximately a quarter of personal income. In recent years, Puerto Rico has received an unprecedented infusion of federal funds in the form of Disaster Relief Funding and COVID-19 stimulus that has helped the economic recovery. Through successive federal stimulus and recovery packages, Puerto Rico received approximately $120 billion in federal funds, equivalent to over 150% of 2022 GNP.”[19] Most of these COVID-related funds, such as enhanced unemployment benefits, Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans, and economic impact payments “were one-time infusions that temporarily boosted output. This major influx of one-time federal funds has strengthened the economy during the pandemic, but even at this level of support Puerto Rico GNP has not yet returned to FY 2016 levels.”[20]
In addition, labor force participation is up, and unemployment is at historically low levels. However, as Puerto Rico continues to emerge from the COVID-19 pandemic, the unemployment rate continues to decline in a trend started in 2010 reaching a historic low of 5.8% in August 2022. While unemployment is still relatively high compared to the mainland, Puerto Rico has narrowed the gap to just over 2 percentage points. In addition, labor force participation, despite being below other U.S. states, continues to rise.[21]
But, the 2023 Fiscal Plan warns that the population is projected to decline due to the demographic composition of Puerto Rico’s residents. “In 2016, Puerto Rico began to experience negative natural population change (a higher number of deaths than births). This negative natural change has continued unabated into 2023. Natural population decline is exacerbated by outmigration. While the updated population forecast in the 2023 Fiscal Plan shows higher population projection relative to the 2022 Fiscal Plan due to updates from the 2020 federal census, the declining population trend remains.”[22]
Also, as COVID stimulus funds dwindle, the growth outlook for the next several years is “anemic.”[23] Households in Puerto Rico and across the U.S. have been buoyed by COVID relief funds. As those funds are drawn down, a drag on the economy may be expected as the pace of consumption and economic activity slows. These economic forecasts are critical to the revenue projections and for informing the budgeting capacity to fund government service delivery.” [24] Moreover, future growth is highly dependent on Puerto Rico’s ability to deploy federal reconstruction funds. The 2023 Fiscal Plan assumes full deployment of disaster relief funds by 2035. “Less than full deployment is a risk that would substantially lower GNP growth. For example, a scenario with 50% deployment of relief funds would result in a 1.9 percentage point decrease in average GNP growth between FY2023 and FY2027, and a scenario with no further federal reconstruction fund deployments would decrease growth by 3.1 percentage points per year over the same period.”[25]
Finally, longer-term, the changes to Federal funding for the Medicaid program create uncertainty. Changes included in the federal 2023 Consolidated Appropriations Act provided a near term boost in funding for the Commonwealth but does not provide additional Medicaid federal funds beyond FFY2027. “The Commonwealth could face a ‘Medicaid fiscal cliff,’ where it becomes responsible for a significantly increased share of Medicaid expenses.”[26]
As noted by the Financial Oversight & Management Board of Puerto Rico in its most recently filed Fiscal Plan, Puerto Rico and the PayGo Systems face substantial challenges in the coming years.